Food Fraud Mitigation Strategies
Aligned with SQF Code Edition 10 – System Element 2.8.2
Requirement Overview
SQF Code Edition 10, System Element 2.8.2, requires:
“Mitigation strategies shall be developed and implemented for those ingredients identified as being at risk of economically motivated adulteration as per 2.8.1.”
Once high-risk ingredients have been identified through a food fraud vulnerability assessment, organizations must take proactive and documented steps to reduce or eliminate the chance of fraud.
Disclaimer: Food Safety Systems is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Safe Quality Food Institute (SQFI). This resource is intended for internal education and compliance support. For official documents, visit www.sqfi.com.
Key Compliance Objectives
-
✓ Prevent fraud in high-risk ingredients identified in vulnerability assessments
✓ Strengthen supplier qualification and trust through verification
✓ Establish a testing program for ingredient authenticity
✓ Integrate food fraud mitigation into quality, purchasing, and procurement systems
Step-by-Step Compliance Implementation
1. Prioritize Ingredients for Mitigation
-
Use these criteria to rank ingredients by fraud risk:
-
• Results from the Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (SQF 2.8.1)
• Known global fraud issues (e.g., turmeric, honey, olive oil)
• Ingredient format (e.g., powder, blend, high-value items)
• Complexity and transparency of the supply chain
Evidence to Maintain:
-
• List of prioritized ingredients
• Risk justification for each based on fraud history or supply chain risk
- • Results from the Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (SQF 2.8.1) • Known global fraud issues (e.g., turmeric, honey, olive oil) • Ingredient format (e.g., powder, blend, high-value items) • Complexity and transparency of the supply chain
- • List of prioritized ingredients • Risk justification for each based on fraud history or supply chain risk
2. Develop and Document Mitigation Measures
-
Mitigation strategies may include:
-
• Documented supplier approval and requalification procedures
• Certificates of authenticity and validated Certificates of Analysis (COAs)
• Authenticity testing for targeted ingredients
• Packaging with tamper-evident seals or serialized identifiers
Evidence to Maintain:
-
• Mitigation plans per high-risk ingredient
• Documentation of supplier qualification and monitoring
• SOPs outlining COA verification process
- • Documented supplier approval and requalification procedures • Certificates of authenticity and validated Certificates of Analysis (COAs) • Authenticity testing for targeted ingredients • Packaging with tamper-evident seals or serialized identifiers
- • Mitigation plans per high-risk ingredient • Documentation of supplier qualification and monitoring • SOPs outlining COA verification process
3. Implement Supplier Verification Protocols
-
Supplier controls should be risk-based and include:
-
• Regular supplier audits
• Ingredient origin or batch-level traceability
• Verification of authenticity documentation
• Adjusted testing frequency based on supplier or material risk
Evidence to Maintain:
-
• Supplier audit reports and approval records
• COA verification logs
• Risk-based supplier scorecards
- • Regular supplier audits • Ingredient origin or batch-level traceability • Verification of authenticity documentation • Adjusted testing frequency based on supplier or material risk
- • Supplier audit reports and approval records • COA verification logs • Risk-based supplier scorecards
4. Conduct Routine Authenticity Testing
-
Testing recommendations:
-
• Use validated methods (e.g., FTIR, DNA barcoding, isotope analysis, HPLC)
• Include both random and scheduled testing
• Rotate high-risk ingredients and adjust scope annually
Evidence to Maintain:
-
• Testing schedules and reports
• Non-conformance documentation with corrective actions
• Retest procedures and investigation outcomes
- • Use validated methods (e.g., FTIR, DNA barcoding, isotope analysis, HPLC) • Include both random and scheduled testing • Rotate high-risk ingredients and adjust scope annually
- • Testing schedules and reports • Non-conformance documentation with corrective actions • Retest procedures and investigation outcomes
5. Verify and Review Mitigation Effectiveness
-
Continuous Improvement Actions:
-
• Compare test results to historical benchmarks
• Revise strategies following incidents or supplier issues
• Perform an annual review of all food fraud mitigation plans
Evidence to Maintain:
-
• Annual program review summary
• Mitigation strategy updates
• Documentation of corrective actions related to fraud risks
- • Compare test results to historical benchmarks • Revise strategies following incidents or supplier issues • Perform an annual review of all food fraud mitigation plans
- • Annual program review summary • Mitigation strategy updates • Documentation of corrective actions related to fraud risks
Common Audit Findings & Recommended Fixes
Audit Finding
Suggested Solution
No documented mitigation plan
Create written strategies linked to each risk score
Supplier testing not performed
Implement and log a testing schedule
No review or update of strategy
Set calendar-based reviews and document changes
Unverified COAs from suppliers
Add a COA verification step to receiving QA workflows
| Audit Finding | Suggested Solution |
|---|---|
| No documented mitigation plan | Create written strategies linked to each risk score |
| Supplier testing not performed | Implement and log a testing schedule |
| No review or update of strategy | Set calendar-based reviews and document changes |
| Unverified COAs from suppliers | Add a COA verification step to receiving QA workflows |
